Formulaic Language Project

Overview

We are working on a project examining the measurement of recurrent sequences of words across various corpora. The aim is to better understand the factors that affect the use of formulaic language across spoken and written language of different text types, by native and nonnative speakers and children.

Background

The growth of research into phraseology, native-like formulaic language use, and the idiom principle in corpus linguistics, cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics and applied linguistics (Ellis, 2008) calls for clarity of conceptualization across these fields (Gries, 2008) and, more so, for basic investigations into the metrics for operationalizing formulaicity in texts.

One of the primary aims of this project is to investigate the effect of a broad range of independent variables, including text- and corpus size, number of authors, register (spoken/written) and genre differences, vocabulary diversity (such as token-token and entropy) speaker age, nativeness and proficiency, upon different measures for identifying formulaic (recurrent) sequences. We are interested in both contiguous sequences (n-grams), limited span frameworks (phrase frames and skip-grams) and collocational clusters (item-sets and concgrams). The measures evaluated include frequency above a certain threshold, Mutual Information, t-score, gravity counts, various reference lists of formulas and various dispersion measures.

We want to determine how the different measures reflect the independent variables and how each measure contributes to the convergent and differential validity of operationalization. These exercises in corpus metrics usefully further the standardization of the measurement of formulaicity in language texts and they prove the foundations for triangulation with psycholinguistic definitions of formulaicity as well as for studies of first and second language acquisition, instruction, and evaluation.

References

  • Ellis, N. C. (2008). Phraseology: The periphery and the heart of language. In F. Meunier & S. Grainger (Eds.), Phraseology in language learning and teaching (pp. 1-13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Gries, S. T. (2008). Phraseology and linguistic theory: a brief survey. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Project Members

Primary Researchers

  • Nick Ellis
  • Matt O’Donnell
  • Ute Römer
  • Stefan Gries
  • Stefanie Wulff

Research Assistants

  • Annie Devine (UROP student)
  • Kumud Bihani (UM School of Information intern)

Related presentations (2009)

Ellis, Nick C., Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Ute Römer, Stefan T. Gries & Stefanie Wulff. Measuring the formulaicity of language. Paper Presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Conference 2009, Denver, CO, 21-24 March.

O’Donnell, Matthew Brook & Ute Römer. Proficiency development and the phraseology of learner language. Paper Presented at the 30th ICAME Conference 2009, Lancaster, UK, 27-31 May.

O’Donnell, M B, Römer, U., Ellis N. C. Examining formulaic sequences in corpora of second language writing. Presentation at SLRF 2009, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, 29 October – 1 November 2009.

Related publications

Coming soon

Contact / About Us